Zhang v. Chu, Appellate Case No. B292418 In this newly-published opinion filed March 5, 2020, the Court of Appeal affirmed […]
Post Tags
42 U.S.C. § 1983
425.16(e)(4)
alter-ego
appeal
attorney work product doctrine
breach of fiduciary duty
C.C.P. § 187
C.C.P. § 425.16
C.C.P. § 425.16(f)
C.C.P. § 1094.5
C.C.P. § 2018.030
Civil Code § 47(b)
Civil Code § 3344.1
civil rights
commercial speech
defamation
judgment
judgment collection
late-filed anti-SLAPP Motion
law of the case doctrine
legal malpractice
litigation privilege
malice
malicious prosecution
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
quantum meruit
settlement
SLAPP
solicitation of money
writ of mandate
wrongful use of civil proceedings
Recent Posts
- Reports to Law Enforcement Are No Longer Absolutely Immunized From Tort Liability
- California Court of Appeal Affirms that Anti-SLAPP Statute Applies to Amended Claims Similar to Those Previously Stricken Under the Anti-SLAPP Statute.
- Taylor v. Bd. of Trustees of Cal State University (unpublished)
- 2020-05-11 – Nelson v. Tucker Ellis, LLP
- 2020-05-05 – Lopez v. Escamilla, Appellate Case No. B300439